View Single Post
  #7  
Old 12-04-2013, 08:15 AM
nuclearkid's Avatar
nuclearkid nuclearkid is offline
Samster
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,482
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My Reputation: Points: 1359 / Power: 24
nuclearkid has much to be proud ofnuclearkid has much to be proud ofnuclearkid has much to be proud ofnuclearkid has much to be proud ofnuclearkid has much to be proud ofnuclearkid has much to be proud ofnuclearkid has much to be proud ofnuclearkid has much to be proud ofnuclearkid has much to be proud ofnuclearkid has much to be proud of
Re: Straight bloke and ladyboy

Sorry for multiple posts, ShanicaLopez. The 'Edit' function is no longer available and I have the lamentable habit of shooting my mouth faster than the brain can process the thoughts. Kindly ignore the point about Geylang, a misreading on my part.

For clarity, let's run through two scenarios. The first, a male client is caught in the act with a female prostitute. Unless either violates any sections of the law , for example she's an overstayer or he bonked an underage girl, they both walk away.

Scenario two: Male client and ladyboy got caught similarly. It would constitute a violation of S377A?

Hence, those were my thoughts earlier on which led to this thread. And a trailing thought... All the FRs (if they are traceable) and any videos that may have been uploaded, would they not be self-incriminating?

Bros please do tread carefully and play safe.